<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadowbox JS Wordpress Plugin v0.4 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/</link>
	<description>Throwing Hot Coals</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3-9791</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sivel.net/?p=48#comment-280</guid>
		<description>@tvbtorrent: The only thing in 2.6 that would break this plugin is moving the wp-content directory to a different location or naming it a different name as allowed in 2.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tvbtorrent: The only thing in 2.6 that would break this plugin is moving the wp-content directory to a different location or naming it a different name as allowed in 2.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvbtorrent</title>
		<link>http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>tvbtorrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sivel.net/?p=48#comment-279</guid>
		<description>i have been using videobox before this but after i have upgraded to wordpress 2.6, its seems to breakdown on me. i tried shadowbox plugin for wordpress and it doesn't seeem to work for me as well. it is because of wordpress 2.6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been using videobox before this but after i have upgraded to wordpress 2.6, its seems to breakdown on me. i tried shadowbox plugin for wordpress and it doesn&#8217;t seeem to work for me as well. it is because of wordpress 2.6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reckonerz</title>
		<link>http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>reckonerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sivel.net/?p=48#comment-260</guid>
		<description>this shadowbox pugin is not workin properly with i3 Theme 1.7.. it makes the sideboxes immovable and disabled.. could u fix this problem in future releases..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shadowbox pugin is not workin properly with i3 Theme 1.7.. it makes the sideboxes immovable and disabled.. could u fix this problem in future releases..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Knipling</title>
		<link>http://sivel.net/2008/04/shadowbox-js-v04-released/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Knipling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sivel.net/?p=48#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Congrats on the work with the Shadowbox and Lightview WP plug-ins.  I don't have a question regarding these plugins per se, but am rather interested in your opinion of these two lightbox variants.  I am trying to decide which one to use for my site.  I like the fact that Shadowbox can be used with various javascript frameworks.  You are obiviously familiar with both, and also know your stuff.

Thanks!

-Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Congrats on the work with the Shadowbox and Lightview WP plug-ins.  I don&#8217;t have a question regarding these plugins per se, but am rather interested in your opinion of these two lightbox variants.  I am trying to decide which one to use for my site.  I like the fact that Shadowbox can be used with various javascript frameworks.  You are obiviously familiar with both, and also know your stuff.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
